Hari ini saya hendak berkongsi mengenai sebuah artikel yang dijumpai dari sebuah laman web. Tentang bagaimana seseorang itu untuk menjadi lebih bertuah dalam hidupnya. Sekadar berkongsi, penulis artikel ini adalah bekas pengasas Abrar Group International.

Artikel ini dalam English ye …

Let me start with a bit of probability: The probability of drawing an Ace from a deck of cards is 4/52 or 1/13. If you have 10 person, each with a deck of card, the probability of at least one person getting an Ace is 10/13 + 45/(13)^2 + ….+ 1/13^10 or we can just say at least 10/13. If we have 2 persons drawing the cards, then the probability is 2/13 + 1/13^2. If we have 10 Chinese and 2 Malays; the probability of having at least 1 Chinese getting an Ace is bigger than having at least 1 Malay getting an Ace.

That is the message that I am trying to convey. Luck in life depends on the number of draws (i.e. number of people) attempting at it; the more numbers you have, the bigger the chance will be. There were many more Chinese engaged in drawing the luck than the Malays, therefore the results are quite predictable. Luck in life is similar to drawing the cards; none are guaranteed to get an Ace, except that if you are lucky. Life is finite, hence we can’t have infinite times of drawing into the cards, in which case one day you are bound to get an Ace. Therefore, for a finite number of tries and if you happened to get an Ace, then you are lucky, while many others who didn’t get it, are not.

The “probability curve” of life in actuality is even more complicated than the one that I have presented; it is highly non-uniform and asymmetrical. The game of cards is a uniform distribution which comes from the normal curve (i.e. symmetrical). In another words, it does not matter who draws the card, their chances are the same. The true picture of life is such that person C may have a deck of 52 cards (with 4 Aces in them) while another person, M, may even have 1000 cards (with 4 Aces in them). Therefore the probability for C and M are totally different. Even if you have 10 C and 30 M, the chance of having at least one person having an Ace is still in favour of C.

The reality of what had happened (historically in Malaysia) was as follows; many people from C type are having a smaller deck of cards compared to others. Therefore, you will end up having many tycoons from the C type compared to M type. But does that mean that C is smarter than M or luckier than M? The answer is NO to both. It is just the way the “game” is being set up. But does that mean “luck” does not have any role? It does, since regardless of the setup, drawing an Ace is still resulting from luck. The only difference is the chance is higher for C, compared to M. (By now you should have guess that C are “Chinese” and M are “Malays”).

Why did C have a smaller deck of cards than M? Because C had been in the game longer than M; they have learned how to reduce the stack of cards, whereas M was a new player and has yet to learn the trick of the trades. In time, M also learnt the game and be able to reduce his deck of cards and may be at par with C. There is no reason why that can’t be so. Off course education is one of the way how to reduce the deck of cards – because it eliminates many of the options that are not viable. It also breeds players that are more informed and learn how to choose in much better ways. And off course, those who tried more (i.e. by hard work), will have more chance of drawing an Ace than those who tried less. But doesn’t mean that trying more will ensure you the result: it just increases your chance of finding an Ace. Obviously trying less or not trying at all will give a definitive result: almost zero chance. That’s why when we look at the outcome today; we saw C produced more tycoons than M. But then it seems to contradict my statement that no race have an upper hand to be successful in business?

What I meant is that if we take away those tycoons and small select group of people out our equation and focused on the common people at large and the environment that we are in now: all of us were born with pretty much the same deck of cards regardless of race. The young people of Malaysia, regardless of race are having almost the same starting point. This is the point that I am alluding to. However, even though everyone is facing almost the same chance; the results will depend on how each group enters into the game: more entrees from one group will improve the chance for that group to record more success. And the faster each group learn, the lesser their stack of cards will be. Therefore, if the Malays want to see many more successful entrepreneurs, then there should be strong encouragement for more numbers of them to be in business and they need to get into the game fast. One thing that we have to bear in mind: what we saw today is the result of the “experiments” from the past. The results of the current “experiments” can only be seen twenty or thirty years down the road. The problem for most people is: they make judgements based on what they see now, and conclude that it will be the same for the future. This is a flawed judgement, at least from my point of view.

I also have not included some other elements in the analysis to make it complete: such as the socio-economic setup, cultural background and government policies into the equation. It could be done – but then the discussions will be a bit more complicated. You can try to input them into the model and be more rigorous: but the result does not in any way change the arguments that I have put forth above.

In regards to Li Ka Shing, I would like to correct a few things: Yes he is a hard worker without any doubt; but at the same time he manipulates the situation such that his cards are not even a 52 deck. Probably he is playing with a deck of 10 cards (with 4 Aces in them). How he did it is by sheer manipulations to eliminate his competitors. In this case – should we call him smart? Or lucky? Or in the real sense: manipulator? There are many other people who are working even harder than him (and smarter than him), but with no results; because they are playing with a deck of cards of maybe 1000 pieces. I despise such figures as they are epitomes of greed and arrogance and I don’t care whether he succeed or fail, because to me he is playing a different game than mine.

Finally, let me just restate my points: Education, smartness, hard working and other attributes are necessary for success (because it reduces the number of cards you are playing and increase the number of tries at the game); but the final result is still pure luck: that is if you can manage to pick up an Ace from your deck of cards. Nobody can guarantee that except by the will of God – and that is what God has dictate that the “Rizq” is determined by Him and Him alone, as the saying goes: “Man proposes and God dispose”.

Kredit kepada Dr Wan Muhammad Hasni

“If you want to be happy,be”
Leo Tolstoy,1900

Adakah kegembiraan itu penting? Ya, ia sangat penting dalam hidup individu. Bukti kajian menunjukkan bahawa individu yang gembira mempunyai sistem pengimunan yang lebih kuat. Ini membawa kepada cadangan bahawa mereka mempunyai kesihatan yang lebih baik dan hidup lebih lama berbanding individu yang tidak gembira. Mereka juga cenderung untuk berjaya di tempat kerja dan mempunyai hubungan yang lebih baik. Selain itu, mereka juga lebih kelihatan menarik kepada orang lain.

Individu gembira kelihatan menyukai diri mereka berbanding individu yang tidak. Mereka mampu menerima komen dengan lebih terbuka dan mengatasinya dengan lebih baik. Mereka juga mampu membuat keputusan dengan lebih baik dan cenderung menjadi seorang yang kreatif. Sangat berbeza dengan individu yang gembira, individu yang tidak kelihatan meletak usaha dan masa yang banyak terhadap tanda-tanda kegagalan. Mereka terlalu berhati-hati. Kesannya perkara ini menyedut tenaga mereka.

Terdapat bukti bahawa bahawa sesetengah kumpulan dan individu yang lebih gembira daripada yang lain. Berdasarkan kajian, negara Latin kelihatan seolah-olah lebih gembira berbanding negara di Kepulauan Pasifik. Terdapat 2 perkara utama sangat berkait rapat terhadap ini. Kekayaan dan keadaan demokratik masyarakat. Kajian menunjukkan bahawa kemisikinan mampu membuat masyarakat sesebuah negara itu tidak gembira.

Walau bagaimanapun, kekayaan yang banyak tidak menunjukkan sesebuah negara itu gembira. Kajian juga menunjukkan bahawa semakin tinggi tahap materialistik individu itu, semakin kurang gembiranya dia. Selain itu, individu yang gembira juga kelihatan mempunyai ramai kawan.

Salam inspirasi

Sebuah kisah inspirasi untuk direnungi. Gary Player merupakan salah seorang ahli golf hebat yang pernah dilahirkan. Beliau seorang yang mempunyai tubuh yang kecil sahaja jika dibandingkan dengan pemain lain. Namun begitu, kelebihannya bukan terletak di situ. Beliau mempunyai kelebihan daripada segi usaha dan sanggup bekerja lebih kuat daripada orang lain. Ketika orang lain mungkin sedang berehat dan menonon televisyen, beliau berusaha memperbaiki mutu pukulan bolanya. Beliau memperbaiki apa yang tidak kena padanya.

Disebabkan itu beliau telah bertuah dalam pemainannya. Tuah tersebut telah membantunya memenangi pertandingan Masters sebanyak 3 kali dan termasuklah pertandingan lain. Tubuhnya kecil sahaja, tetapi beliau telah memenangi banyak pertandingan.

Apabila ditanya mengenai kemenangannya, “ Bagaimanakah saudara boleh menjadi begitu bertuah?”

Beliau hanya menjawab,” Semakin kuat saya bekerja, semakin bertuahlah saya.”

PS : Rasa-rasanya adakah Siti Nurhaliza, Mawi bertuah?